Why Khusanov Avoided a Red Card Against Brentford – Rules Explained
Manchester City defender Abdukodir Khusanov avoided a red card during the Carabao Cup quarter-final against Brentford, a decision that sparked strong reactions from the visiting side. The incident occurred early in the match and quickly became one of the most debated moments of the night.
What Happened During the Incident?
Just 16 minutes into the match, Brentford forward Kevin Schade latched onto a long ball played between City’s two centre-backs. As Schade pushed the ball slightly to his right to move through on goal, Khusanov stepped across and brought him down with a firm challenge.
Referee Sam Barrott immediately stopped play and produced a yellow card for the City defender. Brentford players protested heavily, believing Schade had been denied a clear goalscoring opportunity. With no VAR in use at this stage of the Carabao Cup, the on-field decision remained unchanged.
The Referee’s Explanation
After the match, Brentford head coach Keith Andrews revealed that officials believed Schade’s touch had taken the ball away from goal. According to the explanation given, the referee and assistant felt the forward may not have maintained full control or a direct path toward goal.
What Do the Laws of the Game Say?
Denying an obvious goalscoring opportunity, commonly known as DOGSO, falls under Law 12 of IFAB’s Laws of the Game. A player can be sent off if they deny an opponent a clear chance to score by committing a foul.
However, referees must assess several factors before issuing a red card. These include the distance to goal, the direction of play, the likelihood of the attacker keeping control of the ball, and the presence of any covering defenders. If even one of these factors is judged to reduce the certainty of a goal, a yellow card may be deemed sufficient.
Brentford’s Reaction
Keith Andrews made it clear that he disagreed with the decision. He stated that Schade was clearly through on goal and that the tackle was reckless. From Brentford’s perspective, the absence of a covering defender meant the criteria for a red card had been met.
Media and Pundit Opinions
Sky Sports reporters and pundits echoed Brentford’s frustration. Observers in the press box noted that Brentford analysts were convinced the challenge warranted a sending-off. Former defender Andy Hinchcliffe also argued that Schade would have had a clear shot on goal if not fouled.
Others suggested that Nathan Aké’s positioning may have influenced the referee’s judgement, providing just enough doubt to avoid a red card decision.
Conclusion
Khusanov’s yellow card instead of a red ultimately came down to the referee’s interpretation of DOGSO guidelines. While many felt Schade had a clear path to goal, the officials judged that control, direction, and defensive cover reduced the certainty of a goalscoring opportunity. Without VAR to review the incident, the decision stood, leaving Brentford frustrated and City relieved as the match continued.
